Личностный потенциал. Структура и диагностика
Личностный потенциал. Структура и диагностика читать книгу онлайн
Коллективная монография охватывает широкий круг вопросов психологии личности через призму новой концепции личностного потенциала – системы характеристик личности, лежащих в основе успешной саморегуляции в различных сферах жизнедеятельности.Адресуется психологам.
Внимание! Книга может содержать контент только для совершеннолетних. Для несовершеннолетних чтение данного контента СТРОГО ЗАПРЕЩЕНО! Если в книге присутствует наличие пропаганды ЛГБТ и другого, запрещенного контента - просьба написать на почту [email protected] для удаления материала
Benjamin A.J. (Jr.), Riggio R.E., Mayes B.T. Reliability and factor structure of Budner’s tolerance for ambiguity scale // Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1996. № 11. P. 625–632.
Berger C.R., Calabrese R.J. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication // Human Communication Theory. 1975. № 1. P. 99—112.
Bochner S. Defining intolerance of ambiguity // The Psychological Record. 1965. № 15. P. 393–400.
Brown R . Social psychology. N.Y.: Free Press, 1965.
Budner S. Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable // Journal of Personality. 1962. № 30. P. 29–50.
Chabassol D.J. Needs for structure, tolerance of ambiguity and dogmatism in adolescents // Psychological Reports. 1975. № 37 (2). P. 507–510.
Clampitt P.G., Williams M.L. Managing organizational uncertainty: Conceptualization and measurement // Communication Research Reports. 2005. Vol. 22. № 4. P. 315–324.
Colman A. M. A dictionary of psychology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Craik R.L. A tolerance for ambiguity // Physical Therapy. 2001. July. Vol. 81. P. 1292–1298.
Crandall J.E. Effects of intolerance of ambiguity upon interpersonal attraction // Psychological Reports. 1971. № 28 (2). P. 550.
DeForge B., Sobal J. Intolerance of Ambiguity in Students Entering Medical School // Social Science and Medicine. 1989. № 28. P. 869–874.
DeRoma V.M., Martin K.M., Kessler M.L. The relationship between tolerance for ambiguity and need for course structure // Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2003. № 30. P. 104–109.
Dugas M.J., Ladouceu R . Treatment of GAD: Targeting intolerance of uncertainty in two types of worry // Behavior Modification. 2000. Vol. 24. P. 635–657.
Fibert Z., Ressler W.H. Intolerance of ambiguity and political orientation among Israeli University students // Journal of Social Psychology. 1998. № 138 (1). P. 33–40.
Foxman P. Tolerance for Ambiguity and Self-Actualisation // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1976. № 40. P. 67–72.
Frenkel - Brunswik E . Tolerance toward ambiguity as a personality variable // American Psychologist. 1948. № 8. P. 268.
Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable // Journal of Personality. 1949. № 18. P. 108–143.
Furnham A., Ribchester T. Tolerance of ambiguity: a review of the concept, its measurement, and applications // Current Psychology: developmental, learning, personality, social. 1995. № 14. P. 179–199.
Ghosh D . Tolerance for ambiguity, risk preference, and negotiator effectiveness // Decision Sciences. 1994. № 25. P. 263–280.
Ghosh A. K. Understanding medical uncertainty: a primer for physicians // JAPI. 2004. Sept. Vol. 52. P. 739–742.
Glover J.A., Romero D., Romero P., Petersen C. Effects of a Simulation Game upon Tolerance for Ambiguity, Dogmatism, and Risk Taking, Journal of Social Psychology, 1978. № 105. P. 291–296.
Hampton J. Intolerance of ambiguity: a coping mechanism or mode of evaluation? // Revista Interamericana de psicologia. 1970. № 4. P. 43–49.
Harrington D., Block J.H., Block J. Intolerance of Ambiguity in Preschool Children: Psychometric Considerations, Behavioral Manifestations, and Parental Correlates // Developmental Psychology. 1978. № 14. P. 242–256.
Hofstede G.J. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
Huber N . An experiential leadership approach for teaching tolerance for ambiguity // Journal of Education for Business. 2003. Sept. – Oct. Vol. 79. P. 52–56.
Jaensch E.R. Der gegentypus. Leipzig: Barth, 1938.
Kirton M.J. A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1981. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 407–414.
Kreitler S., Maguen T., Kreitler H. The three faces of intolerance of ambiguity. Alemania // Archiv für psychologie. 1975. № 127. № 3–4. P. 238–250.
Lane M. S., Klenke K. The ambiguity tolerance interface: a modified social cognitive model for leading under uncertainty // Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2004. Vol. 10. P. 69–82.
Ladouceur R. Talbot F., Dugas M.J. Behavioral expressions of intolerance of uncertainty in worry. Experimental findings // Behav. Modif. 1997. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 355–371.
MacDonald A.P. (Jr.) Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: reliability and validity // Psychological Reports. 1970. № 26. P. 791–798.
Madhubalan V. Individual differences in need for precision // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997. July. Vol. 23. № 7. P. 717–736.
Mclain D.L. The MSTAT-I: a new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity // Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993. № 53. P. 183–189.
Nunnally J. Psychometric theory. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Nutt P.C. The Tolerance for Ambiguity and Decision Making // The Ohio State University College of Business Working Paper Series, March 1988. P. 88—291.
Norton R.W. Measurement of ambiguity tolerance // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1975. Vol. 39. № 6. P. 607–619.
O’Malley W.J. A tolerance for ambiguity: catholicism, cover story // America. 1993. Oct. 2. Vol. 169. № 9. P. 7—14.
Owen W., Sweeney R. Ambiguity tolerance, performance, learning, and satisfaction: a research direction // The Proceedings of ISECON (San Antonio). 2002. Vol. 19. P. 242–248.
Pawlicki R.E. Relationship between locus of control and tolerance for ambiguity // Psychological reports. 1972. № 31 (1). P. 102.
Pittavino S. Interpersonal space, locus of control and tolerance for ambiguity: Dissertation Abstracts International. 1977. № 38 (1-b). P. 375.
Raphael D., Chasen M. Intolerance of Ambiguity and Life Status During Early Adulthood: A Three Year Follow-Up // Psychological Reports. 1980. № 47. P. 388–390.
Ray J.J. Intolerance of ambiguity among psychologists: a comment on Maier and Lavrakas // Sex Roles. 1987. Vol. 16. № 11–12. P. 559–562.
Ray J.J. Are psychologists intolerant of ambiguity, 1990. URL: http://jonjayray.tripod.com/intamb.html.
Reber A.S., Reber E. The Penguin dictionary of psychology. 3rd ed. L.; N.Y.: Penguin Books, 2001.
Rense L., Schredl M., Houran J. What precognitive dreams are made of: the nonlinear dynamics of tolerance of ambiguity, dream recall, and paranormal belief // Dynamical Psychology: an international interdisciplinary journal of complex mental processes. 2000–2001. URL: http://goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2000/Precog%20Dreams.htm.
Rydell S. Tolerance of ambiguity and semantic differential ratings // Psychological Reports. 1996. № 19. P. 1303–1312.
Shotter J. The necessity for ambiguity if we are to achieve communication. Conference paper in J. Visser (Chair), Ambiguity, cognition, learning, teaching and design. International Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Anaheim (CA). October 22–26, 2003. URL: http://www.learndev.org/ambiguity.html.
Stoycheva K. Talent, science and education: how do we cope with uncertainty and ambiguities – Sofia. URL: http://www.chaperone.sote.hu/katya.htm.
Stoycheva K., Lubart T. The Nature of Creative Decision Making // Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions / C. Allwood, M. Selart (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. P. 15–33.
Tatzel M. Tolerance for Ambiguity in Adult College Students // Psychological Reports. 1980. № 47. P. 377–378.
Taylor P. A. Strategies for enhancing student learning by managing ambiguities in clinical settings // Nurse Educator. 2000. July/August. № 25 (4). P. 173–174.